Our team has led, governed, and advised institutions including: public retirement systems, state investment boards, multi-employer plans, sovereign wealth funds, and endowments. We combine firsthand institutional experience, broad cross-system perspective, and proprietary governance intelligence to understand how your organization works, how it compares, and where it can improve.
We've led and overseen these institutions — so our advice is grounded in how governance actually works under real constraints, not just how it reads in a manual.
InGov® gives every engagement an objective, best practice-standard baseline and credible peer context — so recommendations rest on evidence, not opinion.
Our value depends on being independent of the system and the conflicts of competing services such as investment and legal advice. That independence is what lets a board rely on our insight the way it cannot rely on advice from an interested party.
Through Board Smart®, the judgment behind an engagement becomes durable decision-readiness for the whole institution — not a report that just sits on a shelf.
40+ years advising boards, institutional investors, and public-sector organizations; former Deloitte governance and risk advisory leader; author on risk intelligence for boards.
Chief Operating Officer and governance analytics lead — institutional investors, public pension systems, and benchmarking frameworks; leads development of FAS's governance intelligence tools.
Extended by FASNET — a nationally recognized network of subject-matter experts with direct experience in fiduciary environments.
Independent advisory to close the gaps, governance intelligence to see where you stand, and just-in-time insight to arrive ready for every decision on the calendar — one system for better governance.
Independent governance reviews, audits, and design.
Best practice-standard benchmarking and continuous intelligence.
Just-in-time insight timed to the board's decisions.
An initial conversation focused on your organization's governance priorities, oversight challenges, and institutional objectives.